Petition Against Unconstitutional and Unlawful Acts of Elected Officials
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

Inasmuch as our Republic is formed on the Foundational Truth - Human Rights are inherent from our Creator, and cannot be Lawfully Infringed upon by Individuals nor Governments; (Declaration of Independence, Paragraph 2)

Inasmuch as the Stated Purpose for Creating the United States of America is to Secure these Unalienable Rights against governmental abused; (Declaration of Independence, Paragraph 2)

And, inasmuch as a long history of Usurpations of Rights through governmental actions, actively pursue the Objective of Governmental Despotism, it is the Right, it is the Duty, of Citizens to Demand Constitutional Accountability of their Elected Officials. (Declaration of Independence, Paragraph 2)

Towards the Purpose of Restraining Federal Government to its Foundational Principal, deriving its lawful Powers from the Consent of the Citizens; (Declaration of Independence, Paragraph 2)

Thomas Jefferson urged the implementation of a Bill of Rights to guard the people against the Federal Government; (Thomas Jefferson’s letter to James Madison, 1788)

And, inasmuch as the Bill of Rights, (comprising the first ten amendments to the Constitution), codifies specified and unspecified Rights of the American Citizen, (Ninth & Tenth Amendments), against infringement by the Federal Government; (Bill of Rights, 1791)

It is the proper Duty of Citizenship to Demand Elected Officials govern, not according to their own proclivities nor the whim of the masses, but exercising their Duties in Accordance with, and Restrained By, our Constitutional Rule of Law. (First Amendment, Bill of Rights)

Wherein the exercise of a Citizen’s First Amendment Right to Free Speech, allows for expressed hostility towards the Constitutional Rights of their fellow Citizens; this exercise of Free Speech against the Constitution itself, poses little threat to the Constitution, weighed against the Citizen’s Right to Free Speech.

However, when Elected Officials, (Presumably backed by the Power of the United States Government or the Power of the State in which they serve), express hostility towards Citizen’s Constitutional Rights, with the Expressed Purpose of Infringing upon Constitutional Rights, these actions are not an Exercise of Free Speech, but serve to Advance Unconstitutional and Lawless Governmental Despotism!

Inasmuch as Elected Officials have Sworn an Oath to Defend the Constitution Against All Enemies Foreign and Domestic as a Provision of their Public Service, it is a Breach of their Oath of Office, and a Disqualifying Breach for holding Public Office, for ANY Elected Officials to Actively Pursue Governmental Infringements on Citizen’s Constitutional Rights. To even Suggest Unconstitutional and Lawless Governmental Infringement of Unalienable Rights, is to be an Enemy of the Constitution, and the State Constitutions wherein they were Sworn.

In Accordance with My Duty as a Citizen, (Declaration of Independence, Paragraph 2), And my Constitutional Right to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances, (First Amendment, Bill of Rights), I call for the Impeachment of all Federal, State, and Local Officials, who have Publicly Supported Infringement of our Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

Infringe
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

Infringe:  
2. Act so as to limit or undermine (something), encroach on: “infringe on his Second Amendment Right”.

Encroach:
1.Intrude on (a person’s right).
2.Advance gradually and in a way that causes damage.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be INFRINGED. Second Amendment – Bill of Rights

They Tyrannical officials of our ever-increasingly Despotic government, have so-far failed to strip Americans of their God-given right of self-defense, recognized by our Second Amendment. Having failed to strip U.S. of our Second Amendment Right, they now pursue a course of Infringement, by which they plan on rendering U.S. helpless.

All of the efforts being brought to bear by our own government are designed to render American Citizens combat-ineffective against armed imposition of Despotic governmental subjugation. To this end, tyrannical officials now seek to Infringe on our Second Amendment Right to the point it is ineffective as a defense against governmental Despotism.

As Americans, we must exercise our First Amendment Right to Petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The point being, “infringement” of our Second Amendment Right is just as Unconstitutional and Lawless as an attempt to strip U.S. of our Second Amendment Right! If we do not stand up and vocally and forcefully protest and resist the INFRINGEMENT of our Second Amendment, we will find ourselves, outmatched, outgunned, and overrun.  
Why the Focus on Assault Rifles 
and High-Capacity Magazines?
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

The vast wealth of the middle class, our nation’s unmatched natural resources, and the industry of the American worker, have always been the financial prize of the international banking industry. Before we were a nation, we were the plumb of the world. The establishment of the United States Republic, and the Unalienable Rights Enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights, erected a roadblock on the highway of plunder. Ever since, the establishment has tirelessly worked to seize the prize which Liberty has kept just out of grasp. Now, our Second Amendment Right and the weapons capable of stopping a military-style onslaught are the only barriers in the way.

The international banking industry does not want to destroy America, just our Liberties. Specifically, the American Prize has its greatest value when the infrastructure and a dysfunctional society remain intact. This allows the international bankers to reap the vast resources of our great land, with a labor base capable of the task, (but little more), still in place. For this blueprint to work, subjugation through mass destruction isn’t a viable option. Too much is destroyed to recoup an immediate financial return on the effort. Rather, troublesome individuals who resist tyranny must be taken out of the equation without destroying the infrastructure.

Pursuing this agenda, resistant individuals and groups are rounded up using assault rifles to overcome the Patriots. Assault rifles don’t create enough collateral damage to draw unwarranted attention or create too much resentment and blowback from the dysfunctional element of society and a complicit propaganda-media. Assault rifles also don’t damage the infrastructure required for “business-as-usual”. Assault rifles and high-capacity magazines however, used skillfully and in the right hands, are adequate to resist the mass incarceration of Patriots. When tyrants meet effective resistance from assault rifles with a sustained rate of fire from high-capacity magazines, more overt and destructive measures are necessary to oppress the masses. Blowback to these more destructive measures becomes a problem for the tyrants.

For the complete oppression of the United States, (while keeping intact the infrastructure and labor force), assault rifles and high-capacity magazines must be removed from the hands of Patriots. This is why every would-be-tyrant ignores the Second Amendment and the INFRINGEMENT of that Right, in a mad grab for assault rifles and high-capacity magazines. This Unconstitutional and Lawless attempt must be resisted at all cost! There is NO option if Americans are to retain their nation and their LIBERTY. The future is in our hands…God help us!

Can One Person Make a Difference?
Copyright Will Ghormley 20013

We live in a nation and a time when honest, law-abiding, hard-working, Patriotic, citizens are intimidated by, if not outright afraid of, their government. We can point to any number of reasons for this. We can blame previous generations for this. But the reality is what are WE going to do about this? That’s a difficult question. We all know something has to be done if we are to save our culture and our Liberty. But, we seem so insignificant to ourselves, realizing the power and resources the government can bring to bear against us. Shaken by this realization, we ask ourselves, “Can one person make a difference?”

The United States Republic, and the foundational documents establishing our rule of law, cry emphatically, “YES!” Our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights are unique among all the nations of the earth. Enshrined in these documents is the affirmation of each individual’s reflection of God’s image, endowed with God-given Rights. The fact we are a Republic, rather than a democracy, fortifies these individual Rights against the will of the mob, and the capricious self-serving nature of our “elected” officials. We are by thoughtful design and stern resolve, a nation founded on the rights and supremacy of the INDIVIDUAL and their intrinsic worth.

Our nation’s strength is founded on the value of the individual. The individual’s strength is their value to the Creator. Because each one is significant to God, (to the extent He would give His own Son to redeem us to Himself), we have eternal value. Our value as individuals in God’s eyes cannot be left out of this equation. Since God’s interest in this earth is invested in individuals, rather than governments, the ultimate power of the universe is found in individuals. But what does that look like?

We have only to look at the life of Jesus for the answer. Jesus came as the servant of humanity, to selflessly give his life for the redemption of mankind. While only Jesus was sinless and could be the only perfect sacrifice for God’s plan, He told us this was the way to live our lives as well. Jesus said, “Whoever works to save their own life will lose it. Consequently, anyone who gives up the right to their own life will preserve it.” (Luke 17:33) Jesus was talking about eternal life, but He applied the same concept to life here on earth when He said, “Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friend.” (John 15:11) Jesus’ life and teachings illustrate the ultimate truth of selflessness being the path of godliness. In selflessness lies the ultimate power of God!

So, can one person make a difference? Yeah, one selfless person, willing to lay down their life for others, can change history! Better yet is a group of selfless people willing to lay down their lives for others. In Ecclesiastes 4:12, the combat-multiplying principle of strength in numbers is illustrated. If and evil man attacks a single good man, the good man might be overcome. But, two good men together can better resist evil. A single cord may be broken, but three cords braided together cannot easily be snapped. In selflessness, brothers banded together for the defense of others is a powerful combination.

The principle however is still in the strength and value of the individual. Each must determine in their heart the greater good of their fellows, and make the commitment alone. I’m reminded of the battle cry of the 506th PIR of the 101st Airborne, made famous by the mini-series “Band of Brothers – “Currahee!” In Cherokee it means, “We stand alone – together”. Spock, (Star Trek), illustrated the same concept when he said, “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” To which Cpt. Kirk replied, “…or the one.” (This concept only applies to selfless giving of one’s self. It becomes mob-rule when selfishly imposed on the few by the many.)

Can one person make a difference? Yes! And a multitude of selfless individuals can make a vast difference. Purpose in your heart to selflessly make a stand on your individual rights as a United States citizen. Then, link arms with the Patriot next to you and resist tyranny.

Obama’s Speech on Weapons
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

I've been asked by a couple of people what I thought about Obama's speech on weapons. So, rather than repeat myself, I'll just post my response.

First, the Second Amendment is about Citizens being able to meet oppressive military-style force with an equal or greater military resistance. The Second Militia Act of 1792, immediately following the passage of the Bill of Rights in 1791, called for Civilians between the ages of 18 and 45 to arm themselves with the military assault and sniper weapons of their day. That is why the Second Amendment instructs U.S. to have a well-regulated Militia, with the weapons in the hands of the Citizens. Second, to protect U.S. from having the government incrementally disarm Citizens, we are told the government cannot infringe on our right to keep, and if necessary, bear arms in defense of our Rights. Infringe means to encroach upon, degrade, or incrementally make useless; which is exactly what the President proposes to do. This makes President Obama, and every other governmental official who supports his plans, enemies of the Constitution, and the Citizens of the United States. Specific points about the speech bear pointing out.

#1. The President is lying about his proposed restrictions on weapons in the hands of law-abiding American Citizens. This has nothing to do with the children he uses as props, and everything with making America vulnerable to military-style force. This is why he is desperate to get military weapons and high-capacity magazines out of the hands of Americans. Knives kill more people in America every year than assault weapons. The President knows this and is lying his Democratic Donkey off attempting to deceive as many ignorant people as possible.

#2. None of the President’s proposals would have done anything to make school children safer, but in fact make law-abiding Citizens more vulnerable to governmental intrusion and oppression. That is the purpose of everything the President has proposed. Much of what the President hopes to do is Unconstitutional in that it infringes on the Rights of Law Abiding Citizens to Keep and Bear Arms. Infringement is just as Unconstitutional as an outright attempt to revoke our God-Given Right to Self-Defense against Despotism. The President Lies through his Democratic Donkey every time he says he believes in the Second Amendment. He is Afraid of You and Me, and can’t tell the truth about his intentions. So, he hopes to weaken our defense against military-style force by depriving us of legally owned personal property. He attempts this by infringing on our Right to own military-style weapons that will be effective in stopping him.

#3. The President is hoping some kook element of society will rise up in some senseless act of bloodshed in the name of “Second Amendment Rights”. If no idiots step forward to answer Obama’s threats, I’m sure operatives already have a plan to force a manufactured “incident” that will allow the President to declare a state of emergency. Once a state of emergency is declared, the Federal Government will shut down all electronic communications: radio public and private, T.V. public and private, Cable T.V., HAM Radio frequencies, all Cell Phone communications, and the Internet. This Unconstitutional “authority” to rob U.S. of our First Amendment Rights was granted to the Federal Government by Obama’s Executive Order, “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions” signed July 6th, 2012.

American has done well in arming itself against this Tyrannical threat, but that is not enough. Before it is too late, Patriots across the Nation must unite with one another in an informal band of communication that does not rely on electronics or the Postal Service. Neighborhood Watches must be organized so Patriots can band together once the communications blackout takes place. If we wait till then to prepare, we are playing “catch-up”. The Colonials fell victim to several successful weapons-grabs in the countryside surrounding Boston. Then, they developed an informal system of “Alarm and Muster” consisting of beacons, bonfires, bells, gunshots, runners and riders. This resulted in the defeat of the British in the battles of Lexington and Concord.

I recommend that every Patriot band together with like-minded Patriots in their neighborhood. Develop a system of house-to-house alarm to aid in spreading the warning. Designate “runners” who will travel to neighboring neighborhoods and towns. Vehicles driving through neighborhoods and towns sounding their horns to the universal Morse Code distress signal would work well. The SOS originally stood for “save our ship”, but has become ubiquitous. On a car horn, it would sound like, “… --- …”. Three short bursts for “s”, three long blasts for “o”, then another three short bursts for “s” again. Repeated over and over as vehicles drove through town, it would be distinctive and would sound like, “… --- …, … --- …, … --- …,” and so on. Redundant runners should be sent out, just as they did with Paul Revere and William Dawes, just in case one or more runners run afoul of the oppressors. In this way Patriots across the country could be forewarned, and therefore forearmed. Today is not too late to start planning for our mutual self-defense! But remember, President Obama is just waiting for some fool to provide a good excuse for the coming crackdown. DON’T be that Democratic Donkey’s excuse!


A Message from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn to America
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was a decorated soldier in the Russian Army during WWII. He was a Party stalwart, but also a writer. While still in the service of Russia, he wrote a few things questioning Stalin’s methods. The Russian people had been disarmed and hundreds of thousands were being rounded up and simply disappearing. The next thing he knew, Solzhenitsyn was arrested and thrown in a prison camp. In the prison camp, Solzhenitsyn had plenty of time to think about everything that had been happening in his Mother Russia. He also came to Christ, to the eternal benefit of all those he later reached with the Good News.

While in a prison camp, he wrote this. “Rub your eyes and purify your heart – and prize above all else in the world those who love you and who wish you well. Do not hurt them or scold them, and never part from any of them in anger; after all, you simply do not know: it may be your last act before your arrest, and that will be how you are imprinted on their memory.”

In his soul-searching and self-interrogation, Aleksandr asked this question of himself, his fellow Russians, and of US. “At what point, then, should one resist? When one’s belt is taken away? When one is ordered to face into a corner? When (some)one crosses the threshold of one’s home? An arrest consists of a series of incidental irrelevancies, of a multitude of things that do not matter, and there seems no point in arguing about one of them individually…and yet all these incidental irrelevancies taken together implacably constitute the arrest.”  

Tyranny whittles away at Liberty incrementally till nothing but Despotism remains. A numb helplessness seems to envelope the collective soul of the society, and the masses reluctantly trudge along to their own doom. Reflecting on this phenomenon, Aleksandr shared this realization with his fellow prisoners in the internment camps. They were seared by the realization they could have done something to stop it, but now it was too late. The Security operatives went our fearlessly against an unarmed citizenry every night. Aleksandr contemplated how it might have been different…

“And how we burned in our camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?...The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation….We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterwards.”

Ecclesiastes 1:9 That which has been, is that which will be. And that which has been done, is that which will be done. So, there is nothing new under the sun.

Those who say America will never fall as all other nations have fallen into Despotism before us, don’t know God, nor His Word. If we are to escape the fate of all other nations, the Body of Christ in America must repent and sanctify itself once again to living righteously and holy before our Creator. Otherwise, we purely and simply deserve everything that happens afterwards. It is time for US to repent, arm ourselves with humility, and stand up in Righteousness, sanctified for God’s works. Then, and only then, can resistance to tyranny bloom in the fruit of righteousness and peace.

The Gustavo Plan
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

There is a compassionate, practical, ethical solution to the illegal immigration problem that has been created by the purposeful lack of enforcement of our nation’s immigration laws. I call it the Gustavo Plan, after my old friend. I would begin to outline the plan as follows:

Phase I
Encouraging Self-Deportation

1.Announce an immediate implementation of E-Verify for all Social Services. Anyone without legitimate papers would be denied Welfare.

2.Announce an immediate hardening and securing of our Border and Enforcement of existing immigration laws.

3.Announce immediate use of E-Verify universally applied across the nation in the hiring of ALL employees.

Phase II
Processing potential Citizens. Processing goes into effect after self-deportation, (resulting from enforcement of existing laws), and after Border has been hardened and secured.  

1.Announce a temporary pathway to Citizenship for Qualifying Illegal Aliens who volunteer for the program and comply with ALL requirements. Temporary Citizenship must have a hard-and-fast expiration date!
  a.Individuals who wish to participate must currently be employed and remain employed during the course of program, voluntarily surrender, supply legitimate identification, nation of origin, and submit to a background check.
    i.Anyone with a history of repeated anti-social behavior resulting in an arrest record would be automatically immediately deported.
    ii.Anyone with a history of mental illness would be automatically immediately deported.
    iii.Anyone with a political history of supporting ideologies antagonistic to the United States Constitution, personal Liberty and Responsibility, (Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Progressivism, Animal Rights Equality, Radical Environmentalism at the expense of personal Liberty), would be automatically immediately deported.
    iv.Anyone who is caught providing illegitimate, incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information during any portions of this process would be subject to immediate deportation depending on the nature of the infraction.

2.Implement intensive educational program that MUST be successfully completed within a reasonable time frame to remain in the country and receive Citizenship. Educational program must cover, but not necessarily be limited to:
  a.Proficiency in English Language.
  b.Successful completion of an intensive course examining the founding of the Republic of the United States, with emphasis on the intention and structure of the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights.
  c.Successful completion of a basic economics course outlining supply and demand, balancing a budget, fiscal responsibility, and sound Austrian Economic Principles.
  d.If at any time during this educational process, the participant displays any uncooperative attitudes or actions, they would be subject to immediate deportation depending on the nature of their infraction.
  e.Upon successful completion of all of these requirements, participant must relinquish citizenship and fidelity to their mother country and swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against any enemy, foreign or domestic.
  f.Optional, a candidates considered for elected office should be required to successfully complete this same program to qualify for public office!

3.To implement the Gustavo Plan without unduly penalizing existing citizens with the added expense, funding for this program would have to come from eliminating existing Federal programs or expenditures. A possible solution would be to eliminate a useless, redundant, Unconstitutional, detrimental Federal Bureaucracy and temporarily reassign and educate government employees to oversee the processing of potential new citizens. The problem would be to choose the most destructive Federal Bureaucracy to use for this purpose. With the expiration of the Gustavo Plan for Citizenship, all Federal employees would be required to get productive jobs outside of governmental employment and start financially supporting the government rather than being a drain on the citizens.

Phase III
Enforcement and Sanitation.  Following implementation of Self-Deportation and Voluntary submission to the Processing program, it would be announced that all illegal aliens in noncompliance will be eradicated from the society. These individuals would consist largely of the professional criminal class. Any illegal aliens taken into custody on United States soil would be unarguably guilty by virtue of their existence in the United States. The published policy of the United States would be to consider all illegal aliens in noncompliance to be foreign enemies of the Nation and subject to a mandatory death sentence after a trial, with no parole or deportation process. The only exception would be for those individuals whose nation of origin would redeem by repatriating the individuals at the expense of the nation of origin.

This policy should result in the Self-Deportation of the majority of the criminal class. At the completion of the temporary pathway to Citizenship, ALL existing immigration laws will be stringently enforced.

Nothing Left to Lose
copyright Will Ghormley 2013

None of us are getting out of this life alive, no matter how we live or what we do. Burned alive in a cabin, dying of old age without medical care, worked to death in a work camp, peacefully wrapped in slumber, the end is always the same; this life is over and real life or real death begins.

Organized armed resistance is the only deterrent recognized by tyranny. History shows people are slow to organize, arm themselves, and resist - until people start dying. America is doing all right arming itself, but without organization, arms count for little. For America to actually prepare to defend the Constitution, some citizens will probably have to die for the Constitution. Those deaths will seem futile and desperate. After all, it seems there is no way an individual, or even a small group, can face tyranny and win. But, I would submit the inevitable deaths are not futile, though they are desperate. But, desperate times require desperate measures.

In the 14th chapter of Luke, Jesus talks about the cost of being His disciple. Jesus asks, who goes to war without counting the cost whether or not they can overcome the superior force arrayed against them. He concludes by saying those who start out following Him but quit, are not worthy to be His disciples. Defending Liberty doesn’t carry with it an eternal reward. Defending Liberty is insignificant compared with knowing, fearing, and serving God. Yet, the concept is the same. If anyone starts out strong but quits, they are unworthy. In serving God and Liberty, one must count one’s self dead to their own best interests for the sake of what is to come.

The HBO miniseries “Band of Brothers” is one of my favorite sources of secular inspiration. In one scene, Easy Company, 101 Airborne, is in a defensive position behind hedges, in the dark, facing a German threat of unknown strength. Soldiers are jittery. Lt. Spears is having a conversation with a very young and scared Pvt. Blithe. Lt. Spears reveals a great truth about both serving God, and being a soldier.

Lt. Spears: “You know why you hid in that ditch Blithe?”

Pvt. Blithe: “I was scared.”

Lt. Spears: “We’re all scared…You hid in that ditch because you think there is still hope. But Blithe, the only hope you have is to accept the fact you’re already dead. And the sooner you accept that the sooner you’ll be able to function as a soldier’s supposed to function; without mercy, without compassion, without remorse. All war depends upon it.”

America, we have to accept the fact we are already dead. Society and life as we have known it is over. We can fight and die trying. We can fight and win and live free. We can fight and lose and live in slavery. We can just give up now and slink into slavery, eventually dieing in our chains after a life of bondage. Unless we are willing to count our lives already lost for the cause of Liberty, we are not worthy of Liberty.

I like what Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn had to say in hindsight. Russia sank into tyrannical oppression without any organized resistance. The people simply did not understand what was coming. If they had, they would have risked everything, because at that point, everything was already lost. The Russian people just didn’t know it yet.

“And how we burned in our camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?...The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation….We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterwards.” Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn

Unless we are willing to count our lives already lost for the cause of Liberty, we are not worthy of Liberty. We purely and simply deserve everything that happens afterwards.


The Money Trust and the Movie “Catch – 22”
copyright Will Ghormley 2013

Every time I sit down to write on this topic, it turns into a book. The machinations of international bankers so permeates our nation’s history there is no way to abbreviate the topic. Thomas Jefferson stated that banking institutions posed more dangers to our liberties than standing armies. James Madison noted that history records every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit and violence has been used by banks to maintain control over governments.  

President Andrew Jackson attacked the corruption of the central banking system that manipulated the national economy for its own gain. He pulled all of the federal deposits from the Second Bank of the United States in 1833, forcing them to liquidate by 1841. This earned Jackson the dubious distinction of being the first American president to face an assassination attempt, specifically because he opposed the central banking system! America then enjoyed 80 years of the most stable economic growth and peace we have ever known.

The Pujo Commitee was assembled in 1912 to investigate charges the “Money Trust” cartel had captured enough banking and industrial assets to effectively manipulate the U.S. economy. The investigation was stonewalled in 1913 by newly elected President Wilson. Even though the committee had to submit an incomplete investigation because of the obstruction, they were able to prove the Money Trust did indeed exist and threatened the sovereign economy of the nation. President Wilson used the committee’s report to issue this statement.

"A great industrial nation is controlled by it's system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world - no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." – President Woodrow Wilson

Rather than continue to fight the Money Trust, as suggested by the Pujo Committee, Wilson instead used it to generated fear among the American populace, and push for a new central banking system. The 63rd Congress ignored the findings of the committee and instead, institutionalized the Money Trust through the creation of the Federal Reserve Board, creating the personal income tax, and resurrecting the Internal Revenue Service as the strong-arm enforcement and collection division for the privately held and operated Federal Reserve Board. Signed into law by President Wilson, our nation’s citizens were now captive financial servants of the 12 privately owned banks that make up the Federal Reserve Board.

In 1961, President Eisenhower in his farewell address to the nation, warned us of the threats facing our citizens. Eisenhower was a General and a great tactician who recognized the various threats we faced as a nation. The General-turned-President failed to understand the interconnectivity between the manufactured threat of communism, the militaryindustrial complex, and the Money Trust however. With his ideologically-limited scope of vision, he tried to warn us of what we faces as a nation when he said, “We face a hostile ideology - global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration.”

Eisenhower warned government actions “must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs - balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage - balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.” Eisenhower could not have known his cautions would go unheeded by a prosperous and oblivious citizenry.

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” In warning us against undue influence by the militaryindustrial complex, Eisenhower failed to see that was just one tentacle of the Money Trust, already manipulating global events.

Eisenhower saw how federal monies injected into University research was robbing educational entities of their independence and objectivity. “The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present-and is gravely to be regarded.”

In an almost prophetic exercise, Eisenhower cautions us against excess governmental spending. “As we peer into society's future, we - you and I, and our government - must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.”  Even Eisenhower was ill-educated on the fact we do not live in a democracy, but in a Republic where individual liberty is enshrined on Constitutional law.

It was against this panorama of history that I watched the WWII movie “Catch – 22”. My wife read the book and viewed it as a character study. I watched the movie and saw it as a comical and creative commentary on how the Money Trust infiltrates and influences even the life-and-death struggle of war.

In the movie, 1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder and his M&M Enterprises represents the militaryindustrial complex arm of the Money Trust. The corrupt pursuit of gain reaches the level that Minderbinder makes a business deal with the Germans. The Germans agree to buy surplus cotton Minderbinder’s M&M Enterprises can’t sell. In exchange, Minderbinder arranges for the U.S. Air Force to bomb their own airfield! It is a comedy of corruption.

However, one of the most enlightening dialogues happens between the naive 20 year-old Capt. Nately, and the unscrupulous 107 year-old proprietor of an Italian whorehouse.  

Old Man in whorehouse: “You see, Italy is a very poor weak country. And that is what makes us so strong. Strong enough to survive this war, and still be in existence long after your country has been destroyed.”

Capt. Nately: “What are you talking about? America is not going to be destroyed!”

Old Man in whorehouse: “Never?”

Capt. Nately: “Well…”

Old Man in whorehouse: “Rome was destroyed. Greece was destroyed. Persia was destroyed. Spain was destroyed. It is true, all great countries are destroyed. Why not yours? How much longer do you think your country will last? Forever?”

Capt. Nately begins to see the point. The question is, will Americans see the point in time to avoid the fate of all other great nations before us. History isn’t written in stone until it is history. America still has an opportunity to throw off the shackles of the Money Trust and reclaim our birthright of Liberty. However, we must realize the source of the threat and the enemy of our Liberty is not the corrupt government that governs unconstitutionally. It is the Money Trust who has bought and paid for those corrupt politicians. Sever the financial shackles of the Money Trust, reject their control over our Republic, and we can regain our Freedom.  

There is No Scientific “Equality” Between Same-Sex Couples and Heterosexual Married Couples
Copyright Will Ghormley 2013

Freedom for all and "equality" of choice also allows fathers to "marry" their daughters or sons, any number of individuals to “marry” in multiples, people to “marry” their pets, and anything else anyone decides is their freedom of choice. Once science and objective provable truth have been excluded from the conversation, who can put any limits on who’s choice is discriminated against, and who’s choice is socially acceptable?

Nature discriminates against same-sex couples by rendering their expressions for one another fruitless. The vast majority of societies mimic nature by discriminating against same-sex couples. Those societies that have always included same-sex couples as a standard in their society, have never developed beyond the stone-age. Advanced societies that embrace same-sex couples as a standard for their society fade from greatness. That’s just natural history and societal engineering.

Reproduction is the cornerstone of any society, whether human or wildlife. It is just natural science that a society’s strength or weakness depends on the strength and health of reproduction within that society. Societies that foster reproduction and the education and development of resulting offspring are societies that become advanced. Societies that aren’t as successful at reproduction and education are naturally retarded in their development by the lower quality of individuals in their societies.

Same-sex “marriage” isn’t scientifically “equal” to natural, normal, marriage between heterosexual couples. A same-sex “marriage” cannot produce offspring. It is physically impossible. Same-sex couples can raise children that result from heterosexual reproduction, but that doesn’t make them “equal”. It only points out the inequality of the relationships. One cannot replace the other. Couples and societies that ignore natural law and science, degrade their own relevance and survivability. This has been proven time and time again throughout human history.

Nobody has to believe in God to understand science and nature. But, if the focus can be shifted off the illogical, un-natural, unproductive, perversion of same-sex relationships, and rather be directed toward a God people love to hate, the argument gains traction. Nobody can credibly deny scientific and natural reality. But, if you ignore that and focus on a God no one can see, you can actually have an argument about it.

Same-sex relationships are not equal to heterosexual relationships in societal or scientific results. To claim they are equal is to ignore scientific and historical fact. Anyone who stoops to claiming lies are truth has no credibility in any honest debate. Debate the facts, don’t claim falsehoods are facts.